Redundant types in composite literals
Reports redundant type declarations in composite literals.
Example:
nums := [][]int{[]int{1}, []int{2}}
We have a slice of slices of the int type. In this case, you can use a shorter definition. You can fix this code manually or use the Delete redundant type quick-fix. After the quick-fix is applied, the code looks as follows:
nums := [][]int{{1},{2}}
For more information about composite literals, refer to Go Language Specification: Composite Literals at go.dev.
- By ID
Can be used to locate inspection in e.g. Qodana configuration files, where you can quickly enable or disable it, or adjust its settings.
GoRedundantTypeDeclInCompositeLit
Inspection ID: GoRedundantTypeDeclInCompositeLit
You can suppress this inspection by placing the following comment marker before the code fragment where you no longer want messages from this inspection to appear:
//noinspection GoRedundantTypeDeclInCompositeLitnote
Actual comment syntax will depend on the code language you are working with
More detailed instructions as well as other ways and options that you have can be found in the product documentation:
Inspection Details | |
|---|---|
By default bundled with: | |
Can be installed with plugin: | Go, 252.26654.0 |